I am not really sure why, but for many, many years I have been very interested in the assassination of John. F. Kennedy. Whether it is purely the mystery that has surrounded the event, I am not really sure. Read on if you're interested, other wise come back tomorrow when normal blog service will be resumed.
I have used a vast number of resources whilst looking into the assassination for myself, including watching dozens of documentaries (sometimes three or four times) various books and a couple of websites.
It is like a fascination, I feel that I must try to discover as many "facts" about the shooting as I possibly can to feel comfortable that "I" know the truth. Sadly, by the time the US government releases many of the documents that are sealed until sometime around 2030 or so, very little information of interest will remain either unknown or de-classified.
Over the years I have mellowed in my view of the events of that Dallas day back in November 1963, I firmly believed for many years that the fatal gunshot had to have been fired from in front and to the right of the motorcade, basically meaning that there were at least two people firing guns at the President that day. Evidence available to me at the time made it impossible to believe anything else, none of the Warren report's findings regarding the whereabouts of the shooter were firmly backed by the physical evidence, and where there was evidence to back up these claims, they had the feel of having been doctored somewhat (specifically x-ray and Post Mortem photograph evidence).
I still feel that this evidence was tampered with, but not for the reasons that we perhaps believe, (that it covered up that the fatal bullet was fired from the Grassy Knoll) but that it amended to ensure that although the shot was fired from behind (* discussion on who fired and from where to come a little later) the medical (and Abraham Zapruder's film footage) evidence was such that it made it look like the shot came from the front.
An excellent and almost unbelievably unbiased resource for anybody looking to learn more about the Assassination is shown below, I recommend anybody view, it provides excellent commentary and dispells many myths whilst providing truly a staggering amount of information, almost more than you could ever be able to read.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm(*) Right so here we are then, we are happy that Kennedy was shot from behind, new evidence has proved that there were three shots (timings indicate that one person WAS able to fire all three shots) all fired from the rear of the motorcade. Conspircay theorists always complain that if there was a single shooter hiding on the 6th floor of the Texas School Book Depository (*TSBD) why the shots were not fired as the motorcade proceded along Houston Street, before making that slow turn onto Elm. A good question, although by firing from well in front, the Assassin would be limiting his/her chances of successfully escaping the building. By firing from behind, there should have been enough confusion for the escape to be made.
So who killed Kennedy, it was moer than likely to be Oswald, but there does appear to be a lack of actual physical and believable evidence proving this fact. More likely was that Oswald was involved somehow and was indeed waiting in the lunch room where he was seen by a Patrolman and a co-worker around 60 seconds after the shots were fired. Realising that the plan had gone to plan, or not, Oswald apparently left the TSBD quite slowly and deliberately, prior to the building being cordoned off, these actions do not necessarily appear to be those of a man who has just shot the President of the United States of America.
Reports from there are a little confused, the offical version of events being that, whilst making his escape, Oswald took a bus away from the area, eventually walking back to his lodgings, where he collected his revolver. By this time an incredibly accurate description of Oswald was already being broadcast over the Police radios, Oswald was apparently challenged by Officer J.D Tippett and alledgedly shot and killed the Patrolman.
Oswald was then seen acting suspiciously outside a shoe shop, before entering a Theatre without paying and was then arrested, after a struggle, for the murder of Tippett.
My personal belief was that Oswald was set up, literally the Patsy that he said he was. Although it has been proven that Oswald ordered the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle (under the Alias Hidell) and was present in the TSBD at the time of the shooting. I believe that he was there because he was told that whoever he was involved with had intended to show how easily they could have assassinated Kennedy, to make a point and to apply pressure on the President to have him reverse his decision to pull the USA out of the Vietnam war.
Sounds perfectly logical, but then that's only my personal opinion, part fact I am sure and part fiction I am certain. If you have an opinion of your own, any resources to share, or comments to make de-bunking my fine piece of reference work here (yeah right) please feel free to post a comment.